Dusan Obradovic vs John Hallquist Lithen Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How do the players compare in second serve performance recently? Lithen leads with 48.59% of points won, compared to Obradovic's 37.59%.
• When it comes to return game efficiency, Lithen also holds an edge, winning 52.2% of their opponent's second serve points. Obradovic wins 46.72%.
• Interestingly, Obradovic shows a slight advantage on first serve returns, outperforming Lithen with 36.85% over 32.88%.
• Under pressure, particularly in saving breakpoints, Lithen excels by saving 54.32% compared to Obradovic's 39.07%.
• Looking at their overall performance over the past year, Lithen has a higher match win percentage at 61.11% versus Obradovic's 55%.
• Both players excel on clay, with Lithen achieving a 60% win rate and Obradovic slightly behind at 57%.
• On the flip side, Lithen struggles more on indoor hard courts, while Obradovic finds it tough on hard surfaces in general.
• In recent event participation, Lithen has generally faced stronger opponents, with an average rank of 215.06 compared to Obradovic's 317.1.
• What about deciding sets? Lithen holds a minor advantage by winning 58% compared to Obradovic's 57%.
• In terms of converting breakpoints recently, Obradovic leads slightly at 40.16% versus Lithen's 35.29%.

Editorial Prediction (May 21, 2025, UTC):

Analyzing their recent six-month performance, Lithen shows a substantial advantage in second serve points won and return game performance, both crucial for predicting match outcomes.

Lithen also demonstrates stronger mental fortitude in saving breakpoints, which is vital under high-pressure scenarios. The ability to perform well in these situations often correlates with match success.

Although Obradovic shows a slight edge in first serve returns and breakpoint conversion, Lithen's overall more consistent performance against higher-ranked opponents cannot be overlooked.

Considering all the facts, Lithen appears more likely to win the upcoming match based on current trends, strengths, and historical data.